Prisons at
bursting point, insufficient staff to run them and maintenance backlogs threatening
to make them unusable. This isn’t the UK but the Netherlands. A country not
long ago renting out its unused facilities to other countries is now having
to consider putting mattresses in cells to increase its own capacity.
Delegates at the ICPA
Research Symposium in Belfast heard senior officials from the Dutch
Ministry of Justice and Security tell an all too familiar tale- prisons closed
when numbers fell, sentences (particularly for drug offences) increasing in
length and politicians loathe to spend the necessary financial and political
capital needed to cope with the looming crisis let alone avert it.
Until now. The Dutch have embarked on developing a ten year strategy for a sustainable justice system- a kind of Gauke Review plus- looking not only at sentencing but at the drivers of crime, at public health and drug policies and at the shape of the correctional response that might be needed in the future. As the conference heard “the problem is too big for the prison system.” Delegates from England and Wales were left thinking if only we’d set up something like that.
The Dutch rate of imprisonment per hundred thousand of the population is still well
under half what it is in England and Wales but like us the Netherlands is being
forced to take some unpalatable short term measures. These include using
police cells and reopening some closed prison units.
In addition, there are currently 8,000 people sentenced to prison in the Netherlands
who are at home. They are on a waiting list to serve their term when a space
comes up.
It’s
not ideal in all sorts of ways but I’m surprised the so called prison queue
has not been debated here as part of the plans to counter the prison capacity
crisis which have been further laid out by the
Lord Chancellor this week.
Could courts
not be asked to keep out of prison all convicted offenders who have
successfully spent their remand period in the community? If they do impose a
custodial sentence, could it not be suspended, deferred, or postponed,
depending on the circumstances?
Perhaps Mr
Gauke’s review, expected imminently, will propose it.
No comments:
Post a Comment