The Oasis Restore secure school
opened to great fanfare last Summer, promising a revolution in the way children
accused and convicted of the most serious offences are treated. Two recently published
inspection reports provide a mixed and somewhat sobering assessment of what’s
been achieved so far.
Oasis Restore has been visited
twice by Ofsted this year, in January to monitor its
progress as a Secure Academy and a month later under the
social care common inspection framework (SCCIF). The facility is both a school
and a secure childrens home but quite why two separate inspections were needed
is beyond me- particularly as the SCCIF covers children’s education and
learning. What’s more the two reports are
by no means consistent.
The educational monitoring found
that most children attended education and even those with previous negative
experiences “participate fully”. The broader inspection a month later reported
that attendance at lessons was not consistently good for too many children. Both
assessments can’t be right. Disappointingly, both reports find that the breadth
of the education curriculum is not sufficient to meet the needs of children of
compulsory school age- surprising in view of Oasis’s track record as an
education provider.
There are other puzzling findings
which don’t match some earlier observations at Oasis Restore. Last October the Youth
Justice Board Chief Executive remarked on “artwork on the walls, and soft
blankets and sofas in the shared living spaces”. She rightly considered these “incredibly
important to help children learn to cohabit and foster a sense of community and
responsibility”. How come inspectors have now found that “communal areas
are not decorated in a way that makes them feel homely?”
The
first journalist allowed to visit the centre last year observed that to
make the secure facility feel more like student accommodation or even a family
home than jail children “can choose their own duvet cover and put up posters if
they want”. Yet inspectors found “most children’s bedrooms do not have personal
items that reflect their interests and identity”.
More troubling still are the inspectors
findings about staff. Oasis make much of the ethos and
habits of their staff and the YJB’s boss last year observed a highly
trained team committed to providing responsive, psychologically informed and
developmentally appropriate models of support and education, and “to loving the
children like their own.”
A few months on, the Principal who
set up the school has left, and Ofsted are reporting on the inexperience and
low morale of a staff team that do not have consistent boundaries and
expectations. Managers and staff working directly with children do not
demonstrate an approach to safeguarding children that is consistently good. Teachers
do not consistently support children to develop appropriate behaviours.
Such have been the difficulties recruiting
and retaining suitable managers and staff, Oasis is accommodating fewer children than the home is
currently registered for.
It is still early days of course and
perhaps not surprising that the Secure school is judged to require improvement
to be good. There are plenty of positives in the inspection report. Children say they can speak to staff if they
have any worries or concerns and benefit from key-work sessions. When incidents between children occur, staff
respond sensitively and make effective use of de-escalation techniques. As a
result, the need for physical restraint is kept to a minimum and is
proportionate. Children speak positively about the range of activities on offer
at the centre.
History shows that all too often the noble intentions behind secure institutions can give way to an altogether more troubling reality, most notably in Secure Training Centres. There are certainly some warning signs for the Secure School. Several staff members are reportedly deeply concerned about the current staffing arrangements, demonstrating to the inspectors “a disconnect between the views and experience of staff and the senior leadership team”.
Fixing this is surely the top priority for a
new Principal when they start work.
ReplyDelete“This is a powerful and honest reflection of the challenges we face when trying to reimagine care for our most vulnerable children. As someone who has worked closely with families, young people, and the systems meant to protect them, I know that meaningful change takes more than good intentions—it requires consistency, trauma-informed practice, and strong leadership rooted in relational care.
The inconsistencies between inspections and the reported disconnect between staff and leadership are concerning. If we are serious about creating environments that heal rather than harm, then staff must be supported, skilled, and emotionally equipped. Relationships are at the heart of transformation, and those relationships begin with the adults.
The vision of Oasis Restore is bold and necessary, but without the right foundations, we risk repeating the same cycles we claim to be moving away from. I hope the new leadership will listen closely to frontline staff, prioritise emotional safety alongside physical safety, and re-centre the humanity of every child in their care.
There is still time to course-correct—and I truly hope we will.”**