Back in 2006, I proposed a
fundamental shift in the way we
respond to young people in conflict with the law, with responsibility in government moving from the Home Office to the Department for
Education (DfE) .
The outcomes for children which then drove the DfE’s work –
being healthy, staying safe, enjoying and achieving, making a contribution and
achieving economic well-being – were as appropriate for children in trouble as
to any others and a change in the machinery of government was needed to ensure properly
joined up policy and practice. The Youth
Justice Board, from which I was standing down after eight years could continue to
provide specific leadership on youth crime where necessary but under the aegis
of a department promoting opportunities for children rather than focussed on public
protection.
A year later youth justice was moved -not to Education- but
to the newly formed Ministry of Justice, along with most matters relating to
criminal law and policy apart from policing. Is it now time for DfE to take over?
Shortly before Christmas, Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood
was asked at the
Justice Committee whether she might consider such a change. “I think it is
a conversation”, she replied. “I am not shutting the door on that conversation.
I would be willing to discuss further with DFE colleagues. Ultimately, it will
be up to the Prime Minister whether he wishes to make a bigger machinery of
government-type change”.
The next day, Justice Minister Sir Nicholas Dakin announced a
review of the Youth Justice Board, led by Steve Crocker a former President
of the Association of Directors of Children’s Services and ex YOT manager. The
review will “consider whether the YJB’s statutory functions remain useful and
necessary, where these functions should sit, and whether the YJB’ s current
delivery model remains appropriate”. Dakin
told MPs the review will also be key to assessing how the YJB and department
should work together to deliver ministerial priorities and deliver value for
money.
These
kind of reviews of arm’s length bodies are usually done by senior civil
servants so could Crocker’s appointment signal a wider ranging inquiry into the
governance of youth justice? He will lead
“a period of stakeholder engagement across England and Wales”, although I haven’t
seen any Terms of Reference or calls for evidence.
For Crocker to recommend a change in departmental sponsorship
might be seen as the tail wagging the dog but those of us who would like to see
it happen should say so. The Child First framework adopted by the YJB would certainly
sit more comfortably alongside childrens social care than prisons.
A recent Parliamentary Question about Young Futures hubs- a hitherto
Home Office plan to prevent children
being drawn into crime – was this week answered by a DfE
Minister.
I may be reading too much into it, but could it augur
broader and long overdue change?
No comments:
Post a Comment