As wide-ranging collective failures to prioritise fire
safety are laid bare in the report into the Grenfell Tower tragedy, what’s being
done in a high risk area where central government has sole responsibility-
prisons?
As the Prison
Service’s Instruction to its staff makes clear “a fire occurring anywhere within custodial
premises could have serious consequences in terms of life, safety, business
continuity and security”.
And many do occur.
Latest Home Office data show that in the last financial year, Fire and
Rescue Services attended 1,892 incidents in prisons and young offender units in
England-an 82% increase on 2022-3.
Trends are broadly consistent with figures released by the Justice Ministry showing that including prisons in Wales, the number of fires in cells rose from 1,410 in 2022 to 2,287 in 2023- up 62%.
While there were only three fire related fatalities in
prisons between 2016-17 and 2022-3 (the latest period for which data is
available), there were 887 non-fatal casualties over the seven year period. This category comprises a range of cases needing precautionary checks as well
as hospital admissions.
Of concern is the fact that the Home Office data show that
in more than four out of five incidents attended by Fire Services last year,
there was no safety system in place- such as sprinklers or misting.
The Prison Service has embarked on a much needed Fire Safety
Improvement Programme to increase detection and fire suppression measures in
its establishments. The aim is to bring all prison accommodation up to modern
fire safety standards by the end of 2027, a commitment made to the Crown
Premises Fire Safety Inspectorate (CPFSI) who enforce the standards in
government buildings.
The
last HMPPS annual report said 4,000 places were brought up to par in 2022-3,
leaving 26,000 to work on. In March this year, 23,500
still lacked automatic fire detection suggesting only 2,500 cells were
upgraded in 2023-4. At that rate of
progress, HMPPS will struggle to complete the work by 2030 let alone 2027.
Troublingly, the latest HMPPS annual report also said that
“prison capacity pressures have restricted our ability to take places out of
use for refurbishment and compliance works”. Pressed by MPs on the Justice
Committee, then Prisons Minister Ed Argar denied
in March this year that any essential works necessary to address critical
risks to life had been paused. But there has been slippage.
The
Independent Monitoring Board at HMP Leicester said in their report on the
year to January 2024 that “the project to complete the fire safety and other
alarm systems has been further delayed and is still not complete after three
and a half years”. The delays may not of
course have been to prevent loss of capacity. At HMP
Lewes, there were problems relating to “the age of the building and the
state of the electrical system, with cost and compatibility issues.” But its not
inconceivable that the desperate need for cell space has led to some improvement
work being postponed.
So what should the new government do to manage fire risks in
prison more effectively?
First and most important is to ensure that the funds are
available to maintain the programme of fire safety work to meet the 2027
deadline if at all possible.
Second, they should take a look at the adequacy of the CPFSI,
which has a staff of 15 to enforce standards in 16,000 government buildings.
The fact that it has only just published its annual report for 2022-23 suggests it may be struggling.
Third, given that prisons pose by far the highest risk among
public buildings, should HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) look at fire safety issues during their visits to places of detention?. Their report on HMP Chelmsford
published in May 2024 fails to mention that the prison was subject to an
enforcement notice which was in force at the time of their inspection visit in February, according to the CPFSI
register at least.
Three other public prisons and two private ones also had
notices in force in February 2024 when the register was last updated.
Fire safety is something which Ofsted look at in their
inspections of Secure Childrens Homes, criticising the obstruction
of a fire exit route in one. Why shouldn’t HMIP?
There are practical steps which the prison service and
individual prisons should take to reduce risks.
Argar promised before the election that an ignition-free Safer Vape Pen will
replace the existing product, which is apparently the source of approximately
80 per cent of fires set in prisons.
But there are structural measures needed as well. The
Grenfell report recommends the government bring responsibility for the
functions relating to fire safety currently exercised by the Housing Department,
the Home Office and the Department for Business and Trade into one department
under a single Secretary of State.
Clearer lines of accountability and scrutiny are needed to
promote fire safety in prison too.
No comments:
Post a Comment