Should we
think of prison officers as emergency workers? This week’s new law creating
tougher penalties for assaults on such workers certainly does so. The categorisation
seemed a bit odd to me- what about probation staff or youth workers who don’t make
the list? They get thumped – or worse- from time to time- I got a head butt
from a lad on Intermediate Treatment back in the 80's. Anyway, I concluded that philosophically, it might be quite helpful to think of imprisonment as an emergency – an abnormal and
harmful situation which we should do everything possible to prevent, minimise
and help sufferers to recover from.
This week’s warning letter from the Chief Inspector of Prisons about HMP Bedford describes a more straightforward
emergency in terms of immediate risks to health, life and property.
The horror stories include a prisoner luring rats into his cell and killing them-
an amputee trying to stay clean by splashing water on himself from the sink- and
frightened or incompetent staff unwilling to intervene with one group of rowdy
prisoners or acceding to unreasonable demands from another to get them back into
their cells. Peter Clarke found attacks
on staff – some serious- taking place at least every other day and even more
frequent incidents of self-harm among prisoners. It's little surprise that this has proved a last straw for the Prison Officers Association who have flirted with illegality to organise a national protest.
In his response to the industrial action Prison Minister Rory Stewart claimed that “we are taking the action that needs to be taken.” But are they? Alongside harsher penalties for violent prisoners, body worn cameras, ‘police-style’ handcuffs and restraints, incapacitant spray and patrol dogs on landings look like a narrow and lopsided remedy. Stewart must recognise this; in Parliament, he described as “a very reasonable proposal” Labour’s idea for an emergency plan, with new Treasury funds, to end overcrowding and end under staffing.
In his response to the industrial action Prison Minister Rory Stewart claimed that “we are taking the action that needs to be taken.” But are they? Alongside harsher penalties for violent prisoners, body worn cameras, ‘police-style’ handcuffs and restraints, incapacitant spray and patrol dogs on landings look like a narrow and lopsided remedy. Stewart must recognise this; in Parliament, he described as “a very reasonable proposal” Labour’s idea for an emergency plan, with new Treasury funds, to end overcrowding and end under staffing.
What should
such a plan look like? There’s certainly a need to revise upward the target for
recruiting new prison staff. Current plans will not lead to the necessary ratios But action
is needed on the demand side too.
Given the concentration
of the worst difficulties in local prisons, the government should move immediately
on their proposal to reduce the use of short sentences. We don’t know the makeup
of Bedford’s population today but when inspectors last went in 2016, a fifth of prisoners were
serving sentences of less than 12 months. Cutting these numbers would free up not
only space but officer time in receiving and releasing petty offenders every day.
Rory Stewart
may be right that “something as serious as changing our entire sentencing policy would require primary legislation and a lot of discussion in the House”
but while getting that process going, his boss David Gauke, the Lord Chief
Justice and new Chair of the Sentencing Council should find ways of encouraging
courts to suspend more short prison sentences or convert them into community
orders.
One way
might be to introduce a new national presumption against the use of short custodial
sentences, recommended yet again this week in a thoughtful report from CREST Advisory.
Another might be to reinstate the principle that courts should take overcrowding
and other painful realities of prison life into account when determining the punitive
weight of a sentence.
Before sending
people off to HMP Bedford, judges from Luton and St Albans Crown Courts and surrounding Magistrates’ Courts ought surely to reflect on the conditions there and the fact that one prisoner in
five say they acquire a drug habit after arrival. Local consultation arrangements involving police, prosecutors, courts, probation and prisons - such as those introduced after the Woolf Report into the Strangways riot- need to be reinvigorated.
Ensuring such arrangements between justice agencies are in place across the
country could also help to limit the numbers on remand – over a quarter of prisoners
at Bedford in 2016 -and those recalled for breaching orders- 10% in Bedford .
There are many longer term measures that need to be taken to stabilise prisons such as providing an opportunity for prisoners to earn earlier – maybe much earlier- release. Rightly or wrongly, too many prisoners feel they have little to gain by abiding by the rules. Again, while legislation would be needed in the long term, some measures along these lines might be introduced without it. Constitutional purists might quibble, but the whole point of a state of emergency is that it requires governments to do things that normally aren’t permitted.
I believe the massive problem with drugs such as Spice are as a result of an ill-thought-out total ban on smoking. Grayling decimated the ranks of experienced staff, cut total numbers and then headed into a policy everyone said would cause trouble.
ReplyDeleteThe amount of contraband getting into prisons cannot all be lumped onto drones and visitors, a vast amount must be going in through the gate, via staff. Until the Prison Service stops being in-denial and accepts this and does proper searching of everyone going into prisons (and not by their pals and colleagues) this will continue.
Finally, a lot has been said about the effects of passive inhalation of smoke from drugs such as Spice, but no mention of its effects on non-drug using prisoners. Everyone, POA included, MUST accept that, in prisons the primary responsibility is the safety and wellbeing of prisoners. Staff come second, as it is their duty and responsibility to ensure the safety of the people they 'care' for.