“Prison can
become a ripe place for criminal education, serious and organised crime, and
radicalisation, rather than rehabilitation”.
Not the words of the Howard League, or Prison Reform Trust but, surprising as it may be, of Chief Constables. The National Police Chiefs Council’s (NPCC) latest strategy on charging and out of court disposals shows how positive interventions with offenders and
victims can be effective alternatives to prosecution or even prison sentences. The Police are right of course. The surprise is only how long it’s taking for a consensus to
emerge that the epidemic of drugs, violence and debt within prisons makes them part
of the crime problem and seldom the solution to it.
The NPCC strategy
echoes much in Transform Justice’s 2017 report “Less is More” which highlighted
the declining trend in the use of out of court disposals to deal with low level offending
and made recommendations about how to reverse it. As the Police Chiefs say “anything
which can be done to prevent reoffending and increase victim satisfaction is
vitally important.” What they call "a whole systems approach" is needed to tackle the mental
health, alcohol and drug problems which underpin so much offending behaviour.
The strategy provides an opportunity to breathe fresh life into the moribund “rehabilitation revolution”.
Not however in prisons struggling to provide basic and decent care. Or in a
probation system on the verge of going bust. But in what the NPCC call early
intervention pathways. Conditional out of court disposals, it claims, “can
provide rehabilitative opportunities without the significant cost of court time”.
There’s an emerging body of evidence to support that claim, from pilot projects
in the West Midlands, Durham and Hampshire.
And a good case for working particularly hard to keep certain types of
offender out of court and out of jail. In addition to children under 18 for whom diversion has long played a central role, the strategy
argues for more alternatives to prosecution for women, young adults and military veterans. As
the strategy says, “prison can be a place where there is exposure to more
hardened and accomplished criminals.”
The case for diversion is arguably strengthened too by another
round of court closures in the offing. Victims and offenders require speedy,
local mechanisms for resolving low level incidents. And the police need to free
up their investigative capacity to deal with the most serious harms and threats
including terrorism, and sexual crime.
The NPCC points out that there’s no new funding for rehabilitation courses or treatment programmes so forces will implement the strategy “when it is operationally and financially viable”. On resourcing, Transform Justice recommended a justice reinvestment approach which uses the savings diversion brings to police, prosecutors and courts to fund local programmes designed to further reduce crime and prevent offending. But some up front funds will be needed to kick start the process- from the Home Office, PCC's and MoJ.
Reducing
demand on the courts should form part of a wide ranging new approach to people
in conflict with the law. The Sentencing Council should be recalibrating the
going rate for certain offences to address the inflation in sentence length that
has taken place in recent years.
It’s both
right and necessary that prison numbers are brought down. The Justice Committee has commenced an inquiry into the subject. New ministers at the Justice
Department should do so as well, looking at all the levers at their disposal to make the system of criminal justice in England and Wales more effective and sustainable.
No comments:
Post a Comment