Recent years have seen a growing and welcome recognition of
the need for a distinctive approach to young adults in conflict with the law. In
January, the Lord Chief Justice, noting that “full maturity and all the
attributes of adulthood are not magically conferred on young people on their 18th birthdays”,
ruled that the youth and maturity of an offender will be factors that inform
any sentencing decision, even if an offender has achieved legal majority. But
what about the implementation of those sentencing decisions particularly where
they involve deprivation of liberty?
Paradoxically, the government looks set to get rid of the specific sentence of Detention in a Young Offender Institution (DYOI) for 18-20-year olds and the dedicated establishments where the order is served. Prison Minister Rory Stewart has informed the Justice Committee that instead of expanding these establishments to accommodate young people up to the age of 25 as the Committee has proposed , the government will instead “consider the continued utility of the DYOI sentence, given the changing landscape of the prison estate…. and explore whether a coordinated approach to young adults within the adult estate might supplement or replace this sentence”.
Paradoxically, the government looks set to get rid of the specific sentence of Detention in a Young Offender Institution (DYOI) for 18-20-year olds and the dedicated establishments where the order is served. Prison Minister Rory Stewart has informed the Justice Committee that instead of expanding these establishments to accommodate young people up to the age of 25 as the Committee has proposed , the government will instead “consider the continued utility of the DYOI sentence, given the changing landscape of the prison estate…. and explore whether a coordinated approach to young adults within the adult estate might supplement or replace this sentence”.
Successive governments have talked of scrapping DYOI on and
off for the last ten years but consultations have come and gone without any
clear decision either way. In the meantime the number of dedicated YOIs is down
to three- Aylesbury, Deerbolt and
Feltham B, with the overwhelming majority of 18-20 year old men (and all women) housed alongside adults in mixed
establishments. Recent inspections of dedicated
YOIs have been poor with successive Chief Inspectors reporting both on inadequate safety and dire levels of purposeful
activity, even questioning the
viability of institutions such as Feltham being set
aside for young adult prisoners.
But as an alternative, can integrated prisons for those aged 18 plus provide a
sufficient focus on the distinctive needs of young adults? Recent inspections
suggest not.
At Hull, while the
prison had at least ended the unlawful practice of young adults sharing cells
with prisoners over 21, “staff had little understanding of the impact of
maturity levels on young adult behaviour and the prison had no specific
strategy for managing the significant population of young adult prisoners.” At Wandsworth almost three quarters of young adults said
they had felt unsafe in the prison at some point and fewer than half said that most
staff treated them with respect. At high security Woodhill, the fifty prisoners under the age of 21 were dispersed across the prison. “Not
enough was being done” to meet their needs and worryingly, inspectors had to repeat a
recommendation that young adults located on the vulnerable prisoner
unit should have a formal risk assessment and a plan to promote their safety on
the unit.
Young women may fare a bit better
but in a rare oversight, last week’s largely positive inspection report on Styal women’s prison
made no reference at all to the small
number of young adults there.
Today’s government response to the Justice Committee mentions a range of initiatives which might benefit young adults, but without great enthusiasm. HMPPS has for example “no plans to introduce a routine in-depth assessment of maturity.” Nor is there any sign of the evaluation of the six so-called Reform prisons (due in the summer) in four of which the government " were keen to establish where and how empowered governors can adapt their freedoms specifically to help meet the rehabilitative needs of this cohort of young offenders".
With so many competing priorities in the prison estate, it is hard to see outcomes improving for young adults in the way that they need to.
Today’s government response to the Justice Committee mentions a range of initiatives which might benefit young adults, but without great enthusiasm. HMPPS has for example “no plans to introduce a routine in-depth assessment of maturity.” Nor is there any sign of the evaluation of the six so-called Reform prisons (due in the summer) in four of which the government " were keen to establish where and how empowered governors can adapt their freedoms specifically to help meet the rehabilitative needs of this cohort of young offenders".
With so many competing priorities in the prison estate, it is hard to see outcomes improving for young adults in the way that they need to.
Five years ago I argued in a report for the T2A alliance
that we need to invest properly in age appropriate institutions which provide constructive and purposeful
regimes, therapeutic help and personal inspiration to enable young adults to
put crime behind them. I suggested a Secure College model, shortly before the name was taken up for an ill judged proposal for under 18's. Such an approach would need more funds; but resources currently spent directly on young adults in custody are less than half what's spent on under 18’s. With the number of 18-20’s in custody down to fewer than 5,000, there is a case for a bold initiative to develop something a lot better than
the choices on offer now.
No comments:
Post a Comment